Who‘s leading who?

It seems to me, you may agree, or as you choose you have your views? Ambiguous language in general, is used to lead and confuse, is it not. You know what I mean, I’m sure, do you agree?  It seems to be clear. Any one of intellect could see, wouldn’t you agree, it is designed to lead.

You too may be amused by the Media News on Politics and the language they choose. Not just the words but expressions observed.  I’m the facts rhetoric, delivered in matter of fact unreserved. You may have observed, as many do, the Media Circus and been sad yet amused, at the unfolding of stories of on 24 hour news, at the words that creep in as the stories perused. Then main News bulletins of sound bite loops, and the leading of politicians by the nose, to jumping through hoops.

It seems to me, you may agree, or as you choose you have your views? Ambiguous language in general, is used to lead and confuse, is it not. You know what I mean, I’m sure, do you agree?  It seems to be clear. Any one of intellect could see, wouldn’t you agree, it is designed to lead.

It’s sad but true, it seems clear to me and I’m sure many will agree, the serious situation of the pressing controversial crisis must be resolved, it is the responsibility of all those involved. The question is who asks the questions and who takes the lead. Who chooses the stories of which News frenzy to feed? Who‘s leading who to which controversial crisis is most pressing to address? Of who and what is to blame and who is to be held up as best.

It seems to me, you may agree, or as you choose you have your views? Ambiguous language in general, is used to lead and confuse, is it not. You know what I mean, I’m sure, do you agree?  It seems to be clear. Any one of intellect could see, wouldn’t you agree, it is designed to lead.